NEW STUDY: Pfizer, AstraZeneca proving effective in over 65s

Vaccine has yet to arrive in-country, missing expected arrival date

NASSAU, BAHAMAS — A first dose of coronavirus vaccines, Pfizer or Oxford’s Astra Zeneca, have proven “highly effective” in protecting senior citizens, and substantially reducing their risk of becoming infected with the virus, according to a new study.

Data contained in a Public Health England study, which gathered data on Britain’s inoculation program since January, showed that four weeks after the first dose, the vaccine was roughly 60 percent effective in preventing the virus among people over the age of 70.

The study with older groups was a missing component from the vaccine’s earlier clinical trials, which did not enroll as many older people in comparison to other vaccines.

In people at least 80 years of age, a first dose was 70 percent effective at preventing infection for weeks later.

That resistance rate rose to 89 percent two weeks after the second dose.

According to international reports, Britain has opted to stagnate second doses of both Pfizer and AstraZeneca shots up to 12 weeks after the first dose.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended dosage of the Oxford AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine be two doses within an interval of eight to 12 weeks.

While several European Union countries remain hesitant about administering AstraZeneca to its older population, The Bahamas has said it will continue to follow WHO guidelines.

The WHO has approved use of AstraZeneca in those older than 18.

The Bahamas was expected to receive its first tranche of 100,000 AstraZeneca doses at the end of last week, according to Minister of Health Renward Wells.

Minister of Health Renward Wells.

But Wells advised the media as he entered the House of Assembly yesterday that the vaccine had not yet arrived in-country.

He did not expound on the reason for the delay.

Asked about the arrival of the vaccine in The Bahamas, Wells said: “There will be an update.”

When asked whether the vaccine will arrive this week, the minister offered a similar answer.

“We will update the public sometime this week, later on this week,” he said.

Pressed on the matter, Wells said: “There is no disappointment. The fact of the matter is I am so happy that you are all concerned and elated and making sure that you keep the Bahamian people informed because when it does come, we do want all the Bahamian people to take it. So, we’re excited about it.”

Last week, Wells said The Bahamas will likely use the first tranche of vaccines to give the first dose to a quarter of the population.

Of the strategy, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has said The Bahamas is positioned to make the best decisions with its vaccine distribution program as it is provided reliable information from the COVAX Facility on the arrival of each tranche of vaccines.

But with vaccine supply shortages and distribution challenges, there have been concerns raised about distributing the first tranche of doses as the first dose for 100,000 people, as opposed to using the first allotment of doses to provide 50,000 people with both a first and second dose — ultimately providing a higher degree of resistance to the virus.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture