University bans Sorority/Fraternity Stoles

The main campus of the University of The Bahamas (UB) was in an uproar Thursday as more than 60 students protested a university ban on student organization stoles being worn at its upcoming graduation ceremony.

President of Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority Inc. Pedronique Saunders who spoke to Eyewitness News Online outside the University Drive campus said, the event was intended to be a silent protest.

Instead, members of the Royal Bahamas Police Force (RBPF) were called in to pacify some of the students just outside the school’s entrance.

“It ended up in an uproar outside the campus,” said Saunders.

“The silent protest was supposed to take place in the library but, when we lined up to go in the library, the security locked the door. So, we went outside the of the gate of the campus.”

According to Saunders, the protest was sparked after the UB Graduation Committee held a board meeting in the President’s boardroom and made a vote on the ban.

The committee came out with a vote of nine to two in favor of the ban of the decoration of mortarboard hats and graduation stoles.

But Saunders, who said she is confused by the decision, noted that UB has all sororities and fraternities participating in all university campus activities.

“It’s like we feel used,” she said.

“Why is it that you want us to perform and participate, but not wear our graduation stoles?

“What we plan to do is to stop being a part of school activities. The campus will be dead, and they will feel it.”

In an email sent to Student Council President Nelson Strachan, UB President Dr. Rodney Smith said, “Graduation Stoles” were intended to be used for marketing reasons and not for the actual use of graduation ceremonies.

He said, “There is no such thing as graduation soles. They have never been an official part of the graduation ceremony.”

“The manufacturers of the Greek Stoles created the name in order to increase sales.

“Some Historically Black Colleges and Universities in the United States allow their Greek Organizations to wear these stoles.

“The University of the Bahamas is not an HBCU.”

The University also sent out an official statement after the protest reaffirming its decision reading:

“Although a time of great celebration and excitement, Commencement is foremost a solemn academic occasion. Therefore, the standards of this distinguished ceremony must be maintained.

The 2018 Commencement Class was advised that the decoration of mortarboards worn at the ceremony is prohibited. The institution also advised that stoles are not approved graduation regalia and will also not be permitted.”

Three hundred of the 700 students in the Spring 2018 graduating class signed a petition asking for the decision to be reversed.

According to Saunders, a major protest is being planned on the matter and will be held soon.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture