Students in Acklins demonstrate over teacher shortage

Lloyd says a teacher will be sent next week

 

Students of Snug Corner Primary School demonstrated at the campus on Acklins yesterday due to a shortage of teachers.

The primary school students, accompanied by numerous parents, held placards, one of which read: “No teachers, no school. End the story”.

In Parliament yesterday, Minister of Education Jeffrey Lloyd said the shortfall of teachers has been reduced, and it was not a proud moment for the Ministry of Education.

“I think it is now well known to the Bahamian people, and I am not proud to say so, but I wish to repeat at this time that the Ministry of Education suffers a perennial teacher shortage that we’ve been reducing over the years,” he said.

“It was as high as 100 teachers short last year, particularly in specialist areas, science and mathematics.

“This year, it is down to 38, but we still have a challenge in finding sufficient teachers to meet the necessary quota in our Ministry of Education.

“That matter is being addressed.

“I am satisfied to tell you today Mr. Speaker in the House of Assembly, we have secured a commitment of a supply teacher who is a resident of New Providence, but from Acklins and who will be going to Acklins as soon as matters could be arranged for her to be there — meaning that we will secure the teacher’s cottage and at the same time [allow] for her to wrap up her business here in New Providence.”

The elementary school has 27 teachers.

Highlighting the government’s obligation to provide students with quality, equitable education, and the convention The Bahamas is signed onto, Lloyd said students in schools on Cat Island, South Andros and Acklins deserve education comparable to students on New Providence and Grand Bahama.

However, the minister acknowledged that the ministry has not been able to live up to that commitment in the way it planned to, but plans are underway to remedy the matter.

Lloyd said he expects the teacher to be in place at the school in Acklins by next week.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture