URCA to investigate Cable Bahamas’ “concerning” widespread service quality issues

NASSAU, BAHAMAS-  The Utilities Regulation and Competition Authority (URCA) has pledged to investigate the quality of Cable Bahamas’ television service, describing the widespread service quality issues as “concerning”.

In a statement on its approval of Cable Bahamas Limited’s application to restructure its pay television packages, the regulator said that it found it necessary to “address customers’ discontent with CBL’s service quality which was a recurring theme in the consultation responses”.

It noted that “despite being outside the scope of this consultation, the widespread quality issues are concerning”.

URCA said that following the publication of the final decision of Cable Bahamas’ application it would launch an investigation into the recurring complaints.

Regarding the company’s approval to repackage its  REVTV offers for both residential and business pay television subscribers, the regulator noted that it received over 100 written responses.

“Despite URCA’s efforts to educate the public, there was an inaccurate perception held by some that the entire repacking proposal was solely about a price increase. It appears to URCA that some respondents did not have a full understanding of the repackaging,” the regulator said.

The regulator ultimately determined that Cable Bahamas’ applications were complete, “does not give rise to any anti-competitive concerns and are compatible with the Communications Act and sector Policy objectives.”

The regulator noted that additional time beyond the one months notice is needed to inform the public of  the repackaging.

URCA also noted that many respondents had indicated that they used streaming and online services such as Netflix and Amazon’s Firestick; however, only a small percentage had unsubscribed from Cable Bahamas’ services completely. Some respondents also said they were unhappy with the number of Spanish-speaking channels considering The Bahamas is an English-speaking country.

“Many respondents were unhappy with CBL’s television service quality due to recurring outages, error messages, pixelated channels an incorrect TV guide, and dissatisfaction with DVR boxes,” the regulator noted.

According to Cable Bahamas, in order to align its REVTV offers with customer viewing habits, the company will reduce the content costs of its REVTV plans by removing channels it deems to have low value to customers.

The company also plans to replace some of the more popular channels with cheaper content in line with the Hallmark approach piloted by OUR TV last year.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture