Thompson: Economic spin won’t pay bills

NASSAU, BAHAMAS — Opposition Shadow Finance Minister Kwasi Thompson has slammed the Davis administration for what he describes as an “economic PR campaign built on paper-thin numbers,” warning that the government’s optimistic narrative does not reflect the everyday struggles of Bahamian families.

“The Prime Minister is making a big deal over a 0.1 percent tweak in growth forecasts and slight changes in ratings language,” Thompson said in a statement. “But the truth is, under the PLP, our economy is underperforming, and Bahamians are paying the price.”

Thompson pointed to the IMF’s latest economic outlook, which revised growth projections for The Bahamas from 1.7 percent to 1.8 percent — a modest increase following a sharper downgrade from a previous 2.3 percent forecast.

“This isn’t progress — it’s stagnation,” Thompson argued. “At 1.8 percent, growth is inadequate to confront our nation’s structural challenges, ranging from high unemployment and rising inequality to unsustainable public debt and overdependence on tourism.”

He dismissed government celebrations over recent credit rating updates, noting that while agencies like Moody’s have improved their outlooks, actual ratings remain unchanged.

“Moody’s hasn’t upgraded our rating,” he said. “A better outlook doesn’t change the fact that the PLP is missing its self-imposed debt reduction targets. The government is still borrowing heavily and not delivering enough return.”

Thompson further cited Fitch’s confirmation of a BB- rating and its warning about low growth potential and high debt, as well as the Central Bank’s own “subdued” forecast for the next two years.

“While the PLP pushes out press releases, Bahamian families are struggling with inflation, high taxes and fees,” he said. “Health costs continue to rise. Food prices are up. Every week, life gets more and more expensive. And our young people are being hit hardest.”

“In the PLP’s world, things are just fine, but in the real world, Bahamians can’t afford business as usual. It’s time for a government focused more on substance than spin.”

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture