Team Bahamas named for CARIFTA 2024

NASSAU, BAHAMAS — The 76-member team that will represent The Bahamas at the 51st CARIFTA Games in Grenada has been named and ratified by the Bahamas Association of Athletic Associations (BAAA).

The names made their way to our sports desk following three days of fiercely competitive CARIFTA trials at the Thomas A. Robinson track and field stadium last week.

Caudell McNabb is the team’s head coach. He will be assisted by James Rolle, Raquel Harris, Alexis Roberts, Branson Rolle, and Kenny Moxey Sr.

 

MANAGEMENT TEAM

Sophia Higgs – Manager
Oche’ Smith – Assistant Manager
Claudell McNabb – Head Coach
James Rolle – Asst. Coach
Laquell Nairn – Asst. Coach
Alexis Roberts – Asst. Coach
Kenny Moxey Sr. – Asst. Coach
Mikhilo Strachan – Chaperone
Lisa Armbrister – Chaperone
Jacqueline Rolle-Davis – Chaperone
Kent Bazzard – Doctor
Ashlee Dorsett – Physiotherapist
Atonya Knowles – Massage Therapist

 

U17 GIRLS

Keyezra Thomas
Alexis Roberts
Darvinique Dean
Jasmine Thompson
Alexandria Komolafe
Terell McCoy
Dior Rae Scott
Kamera Strachan
Madison Moss
Shikah Rolle
Khylee Wallace
Kianna Henchell
Rizpah Thompson
Jade Knowles
Zoe Adderley

 

U17 BOYS

Ishmael Rolle
Everette Fraser
Eagan Neely
Jachario Wilson
Tieano Ferguson
Joshua Williams
Claudius Burrows
Devon Davis
Carlin Archer
Terrin Beckles
Jalen Stuart
Wyatt Cartwright
Keon Burrows
Shevanno Nixon
Branden Mackey
Lamorn Moxey
Jayden Moss
Ethan North
Perry McPhee

U20 GIRLS

Shayann Demeritte
Shatalya Dorsett
Nya Wright
Nia Richards
Erin Barr
Acari Roberts
Annae Mackey
Cailyn Johnson
Bayli Major
Lanisha Lubin
Koi Adderley
Tasha Stubbs
Vanessa Sawyer
Jasmine Mackey
Anniah Rolle
Jade Ferguson
Tamia Taylor
Aliah Evans
Shannia Adderley
Kaielle Gray

U20 BOYS

Carlos Brown
Jermiah Adderley
Zion Shepherd
Zion Miller
Shamar Davis
Bernard Kemp
Robert Deal III
Tahj Brown
Robert Stuart
Kaden Cartwright
Brenden Vanderpool
Tyler Cash
Morgan Moss
Berkley Munnings
Kenny Moxey
Marco Carey
William McKinney
Rolllie Hanna
Jonathan Harris
Javano Bridgewater
Najee McBride
Aiden Kelly

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture