Shanty town deadline unrealistic, says activists

Shanty town residents are not prepared to relocate by end of July as they face multiple challenges with the two-month deadline, according to one local human rights advocacy group.

Rights Bahamas President Stephanie St. Fleur said Wednesday that shanty town residents are not prepared to leave their homes come July 31.

St. Fleur, who appeared as a guest on ILTV talk show Beyond the Headlines (BTH) with host Clint Watson, said, “the majority of the people living in the Shanty Towns are not ready to move.”

St. Fleur explained reasons why residents are not ready and how the new deadline is already posing challenges for these residents.

“There’s a lady that I interviewed when I went into one of the shanty towns, and she said, all she was waiting on was her citizenship where she can find a job and move,” St. Fleur said.

She added that finances play a major role when it comes to relocating, and many “are not financially capable of moving because they not working.”

Human Rights Activist Louby Georges also weighed in on the discussion and highlighted the fact that the shanty town “problem” is nothing new to The Bahama.

“This problem that we as a Bahamian society have had to deal with for quite some time, and successive governments are complicit in allowing it to balloon to where it is today,” he said.

“There is no quick fix.

“You have persons who are residing in this country, who have a legitimate right to be here who have issues with their applications that are pending up at the Department of Immigration.

“There are so many things that are intertwined into this one issue.”

Engaged citizen Deran Thompson Sr., blasted the government, calling it “incredibly unreasonable” and “inhumane” for going forth with the new deadline.

Citing a more recent statistical report on the average income of shanty town residents, Thompson Sr. indicated that “76 per cent of the persons of the households actually make less than $400 a week per household”.

Thompson asked, “Where are these people going to go? You have to look at it from a humane standpoint first and foremost. These are human beings we are talking about.”

“If I was forced to move in two months with me, with means, it would be very difficult for me to move.

“We have to look at the other side of it and we have to figure out alternative housing prior to any deadline. Where are they going?”

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture