PM gives Davis green light for Family Island VAT tour

video
Please enable JavaScript
.fp-color-play{opacity:0.65;}.controlbutton{fill:#fff;}play-sharp-fill
00:58

 

Yesterday Prime Minister Dr. Hubert Minnis extended an invitation to foot the bill for Leader of the Opposition Philip Davis to conduct town hall meetings with Family Island residents to discuss the implementation of value-added tax (VAT).

It’s not very often that government and the opposition Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) see eye-to-eye, but an exchange of words between both sides across the floor of the House of Assembly Wednesday morning proved that it is possible for the two opposing forces to agree on certain terms.

Just days before VAT is introduced at 12 per cent, the prime minister launched a Family Island tour to conduct town hall meetings to discuss the tax hike’s rollout.

So far, the prime minister has visited Andros and flew to Exuma Wednesday evening. His next stop will take him to Cat Island, Rum Cay and Sal Salvador and then Inagua.

Davis expressed concern Wednesday that was the prime minister’s efforts were not only a little too late but were also partisan.

“Our system demands balance and fairness when it comes to matters of promoting partisan public policy objectives,” Davis said.

“We were concerned until this morning that the prime minister may not have appreciated the point and how his travels may have been perceived as partisan as opposed to state objectives.”

He held these views until Dr. Minnis agreed to extend the courtesy of funding the Progressive Liberal Party’s (PLP) Family Island tour.

“The PLP welcomes the offer of the prime minister for an equal opportunity to make the case as to why the tax rates on VAT should remain the same,” he said.

“The party plans to take up the offer forthwith and begin its tour of the country to put the case opposite the prime minister’s.”

The two men got into a friendly verbal back-and-forth on the house floor, which sent parliamentarians into a laughing frenzy.

In the end, they both agreed that the effort would provide Bahamians with reasonable dialogue about the impending tax hike.

VAT will be rolled out on July 1.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture