PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT CONSENSUS: Most survey respondents agree with continued emergency orders

93% of respondents say govt’s COVID-19 management matters in their voting choice

NASSAU, BAHAMAS — The continued public state of emergency and use of emergency powers to mitigate the coronavirus pandemic is largely viewed as a necessary tool to stop the spread of the virus, according to a new survey conducted by Bahamian research and polling firm Intel Cay.

A total of 5,236 respondents participated in the survey.

It was conducted between August 21 and September 5.

Intel Cay data.

According to the data, 54 percent of respondents agreed with the ongoing use of the emergency powers, while another 36 percent said the continued use was an abuse of power.

Another 10 percent of respondents said they were not sure on the matter.

The survey also broke down the data via political affiliation, showing that the vast majority of respondents who thought the emergency orders were an abuse of power support the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP).

Among the approximately 1,884 respondents who believe the emergency powers are an abuse of power, 67 percent supported the PLP; four percent supported the Free National Movement (FNM); and 36 percent were undecided.

Meanwhile, 91 percent of respondents who agreed with the continued use of the emergency orders supported the FNM.

Another 25 percent of respondents in agreement with the emergency powers were PLPs and 47 percent were undecided.

Ninety-three percent of respondents said the government’s management of COVID-19 is important to their voting decision.

Asked how important the government’s management of the COVID-19 pandemic is to their voting choice, 73 percent of respondents said “very important” and 20 percent said “important”.

Another six percent said management of the pandemic was “unimportant” to their voting choice, and one percent said it was “very unimportant”.

As it relates to voting importance of the upcoming election, 73 percent of respondents said the 2021 election is more important than past elections.

Among respondents who support the PLP, 86 percent said the 2021 election is more important than past elections, while 74 percent of respondents who support the FNM said the same.

Intel Cay data.

Another 62 percent of respondents were undecided.

A total of 84 percent of respondents felt the recovery of the economy and COVID-19 and healthcare should top the list of priorities the government should focus on after the 2021 General Election.

While 45 percent said economic recovery should be the top priority, another 39 percent said the pandemic and healthcare.

Asked to choose from a list of what matters most when making their voting decision, 69 percent said the future of the country was the top consideration when deciding who to vote for.

Another 14 percent said their household’s future; 13 percent said their personal future; three percent said the future of the constituency; and one percent was not sure.

Intel Cay used a combination of web-based targeted and non-targeted as well as door-to-door for its surveying.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture