Marco Archer’s family hoped for Goodman’s death

Disappointed, angry and relieved is how the sister of Marco Archer described her family’s reaction to his killer narrowly avoiding the death penalty.

In an interview with Eyewitness News Tuesday, Tancia Humes said, her family “hoped, prayed and wished” Khofe Goodman would die for the brutal murder of her 11-year-old brother, who was a student of Columbus Primary School.

But the Supreme Court decided on another direction.

Archer was found dead in bushes behind an apartment complex on Yorkshire Drive back in 2011. The sixth-grade student of Columbus Primary was reported missing after he failed to return home from the store purchasing candy.

Goodman was originally convicted of murdering Archer on August 2, 2013 and sentenced to death by hanging by Justice Bernard Turner on October 29, 2013.

The Court of Appeal (COA), however, overturned the conviction and sentence, ordering a retrial due to  pretrial publicity.

On Monday, Goodman, 42, was re-sentenced to 55 years in prison.

“We didn’t like the back and forth, it was prolonged the sentencing and should have happened months ago unfortunately I guess that’s our court system, we planned and hoped and prayed for the death penalty,” Humes said.

“I guess we’re satisfied with the 55 years. If the Attorney General’s office decides that they want to appeal the sentencing, we’re with them 100 per cent.”

Humes said she does not believe Goodman can be rehabilitated.

“He has been in and out of jail, he has been convicted…,” Humes said.

“How could someone be rehabilitated who has been doing this same thing for all his life, from he was a teenager. I can’t see that being possible and all that should have been considered by the judge…

“This is not somebody who has done this once. He has been doing this. This is now in the public’s eye and we are aware of what he has been doing over the years because my brother is dead because he killed him.

“Other than that, it wouldn’t have been known. So, I totally disagree with that and we believe that he should have gotten the death penalty but we also are satisfied with the 55 years because that means he will not be seen on these streets – walking these streets anymore.

“We thank God for that.”

This is the third time Goodman has been sentenced for having inappropriate relationships with young boys.

In 1993, he was convicted of unnatural carnal knowledge against a 10-year-old boy and was sentenced to three years in prison.

In 1996, he was sentenced to 18 years in prison for attempted murder and causing bodily harm to another 10-year-old boy.

Goodman has indicated he intends to appeal his latest sentence.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture