Investment Warning: SCB Cautions Public on IncomeMax Operations

NASSAU, BAHAMAS — The Securities Commission of The Bahamas (SCB) has issued a second warning in as many weeks about potentially fraudulent investment activity, this time flagging IncomeMax as exhibiting the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme.

In a statement, the SCB said: “It has come to the attention of the Commission that IncomeMax may be conducting activities in or from within The Bahamas that are either registrable/licensable or illegal under one or more of the Acts. The Commission hereby advises the public that IncomeMax and its agents or representatives are not registered with or licensed by the Commission. Furthermore, its activity may constitute a violation of one or more of the Acts.”

According to the SCB, IncomeMax presents itself as an investment platform and is highly active on social media, particularly Instagram, Facebook, and Telegram. The entity is reportedly soliciting individuals to join by sending a minimum of $150 in cryptocurrency. In return, participants are promised the ability to withdraw $1,500 for each $150 deposit.

“This activity by IncomeMax has the hallmarks of a Ponzi scheme,” the Commission noted, “which is classified as a financial scheme under the Financial and Corporate Service Providers Act, 2020. This renders it an unlawful operation in this jurisdiction.”

The Commission warned that individuals doing business with IncomeMax or its representatives do so at their own risk, as the entity is not authorized or regulated. The public is urged to exercise extreme caution and avoid potential financial loss.

SCB officials have warned that engaging in or promoting unlicensed financial schemes such as Ponzi or pyramid schemes could lead to criminal liability and fines of up to $100,000.

Last week, the SCB issued a similar warning regarding Creators Alliance, stating that the entity displayed the hallmarks of a pyramid scheme. The Commission confirmed that a formal investigation had been launched amid rising concerns about the legitimacy of the platform, following numerous complaints that users were no longer receiving promised payouts.

According to the SCB, Creators Alliance appears to be based in California and operates using a multi-level marketing structure. Participants are required to pay a “purchase price” to join for a six-to-seven-month term and are promised daily income for watching videos, along with a return of their initial investment at the end of the period.

The Commission stated: “This activity by Creators Alliance has the hallmarks of a pyramid scheme, which is classified as a financial scheme under the Financial and Corporate Service Providers Act, 2020. This renders CA an unlawful operation within this jurisdiction.”

Complaints about Creators Alliance have also emerged in St. Lucia and Puerto Rico, where similar platforms operating under the same name have reportedly stopped making payments. Participants in those countries are now seeking out company representatives, with some alleging identity theft and other fraudulent activity.

The Royal Bahamas Police Force has confirmed it is also investigating the platform.

In a public statement last week, Creators Alliance manager Shiro Hing sought to reassure users stating: “Creators Alliance has not crashed. Instead, we have made an elaborate shift to a new system that will greatly enhance security, efficiency, and overall user experience… We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience and assure users that all salaries will be processed and received within the next few hours.”

The SCB is urging the public to remain vigilant and avoid engagement with unlicensed or unregulated financial operations, warning that such platforms often carry significant financial and legal risks.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture