Global oil prices projected to rise this year

Price of fuel declines month-over-month

 

NASSAU, BAHAMAS – With global oil prices creeping upwards since December 2018, there will likely be a knock-on effect on gas and electricity costs in The Bahamas, though the cost at the pump and the price of the utility costs have declined month-over-month.

Brent crude oil, used to price international oils, was at $65.77 per barrel yesterday.

Meanwhile, benchmark U.S. crude oil stood at $56.66 per barrel.

International investment banks benchmark oil prices, averaging around $68-$73 a barrel.

In its March 3 report, Barclays economists projected that brent crude oil could increase to $70 this year as a result of “more critical and bullish determinants of the oil price and oil price volatility in the year ahead”.

In December 2018, brent crude oil stood at $50.77 per barrel.

Last October, the cost of brent crude was peaked at over $86 per barrel.

In its Monthly Economic and Financial Developments (MEFD) report for January, released yesterday, the Central Bank of The Bahamas’ noted that inflation rates quickened for healthcare, transport, but conversely tapered for housing, water, gas and electricity.

“In terms of domestic energy costs, both diesel and gasoline prices fell by 3.0 per cent and 4.1 per cent, month-on-month to $4.55 and $4.73 per gallon during December,” the Central Bank noted.

“However, on a yearly basis, the average cost for both components firmed by 12.3 per cent and 7.0 per cent, respectively.”

With the upward forecast of brent crude oil, it remains to be seen what impact there could be on domestic gas prices and electricity.

The cost of gas at Rubis stations has held at $4.24; Esso station have maintained its fuel at $4.19.

Meanwhile, the price of Shell gas increased in the last week by eight cents to $4.28.

Last month, Bahamas Power and Light (BPL) Chairman Dr. Donovon Moxey said despite the significant fall in global oil prices up to that point, customers should not expect the fuel surcharge on bills to fall anytime soon.

The fuel surcharge is passed directly onto consumers.

BPL has said it capped the charge to 19.15 cents per kilowatt hour to reduce the immediate impact on its customers.

The actual cost was closer to 22 cents.

While speaking to reporters in February on the sidelines of a Rotary Club of Nassau meeting, Moxey said BPL’s regulatory, the Utilities Regulations and Competition Authority (URCA), advised it that the fuel surcharge cost that it absorbed last year had to be passed onto BPL customers.

“We’ve put together basically a process where overtime, as the cost of electricity goes down, we will look to slowly pass those costs — that we ended up financing as BPL — onto the customer,” the chairman said.

“The cost of fuel surcharge will not go above 19.15 cents because it’s no different than essentially anybody financing an additional cost and then doing what’s called cost recovery.”

Fuel surcharge, which typically makes up the majority of electricity costs for consumers, shot up last September as a direct result of the loss of two generators at the Clifton Pier Power Station following three fires at the plant.

As a result, BPL increased its reliance on its Blue Hill Power Station, which operators on more expensive fuel.

Year-on-year (between October 2017 and October 2018) the average bill for residential customers increased by approximately 45 per cent, according to data provided by the power company.

BPL has yet to regain possession of its damaged D-11 and D-12 generators, which remain in the hands of insurers.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture