DPM: Opportunities in Disruption

The Bahamas will likely be affected by a new wave of regulations from countries looking to safeguard their tax dollars, according to the Deputy Prime Minister Peter Turnquest.

Speaking at Deltec’s annual conference on ‘Trusting Disruption’, the DPM and Minister of Finance Turnquest said disruption has been one of the defining characteristics of the 21st century, particularly in the past ten years, and there is no telling when – if ever – the country will reach the end of this cycle.

“Disruptions caused by the digitization of the economy are leading to a new wave of regulatory reform. As countries around the world innovate new ways to safeguard against the erosion of their tax base, these developments will undoubtedly affect us here in The Bahamas,” he said. “To sure up our global competitiveness, we are already looking to the future, anticipating and preparing for the changes on the horizon, forming coalitions to influence the nature of change.”

Pointing to the government’s Digital Currency Initiative, Potential of blockchain for government modernization and other Fintech areas of interest, Turnquest said The Bahamas was taking advantage of opportunities in the industry.

“The Bahamas is at a nascent stage when it comes to harnessing the power of disruptive technologies, but we are making strides nonetheless,” he said. “For us, this is not a choice, this is an imperative. We are an international financial services center and Fintech is one of the fastest growing and innovating industries.”

Much needed regulations guiding the growth of financial technology in The Bahamas is now on the way, with the Bahamas Financial Services Board Executive Director Tanya McCartney revealing recently that the Securities Commission of The Bahamas had started the discussions around the topic.

“Noting the growing interest in the jurisdiction as it relates to initial coin offerings, crypto exchanges, and other digital token arrangements, the Commission has initiated discussions for the development of a regulatory framework aimed at providing clarity to participants in the crypto space,” said McCartney. “It is also taking cognizance of the emergence of Risk-Based Supervision as an approach to regulatory supervision of financial institutions globally

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture