Committee for the establishment of local government in the capital to release report soon

The recently appointed advisory committee for the establishment of local government in New Providence will release its first report in August, according to the committee’s Vice Chairman and Transport and Local Government Director Ceephas Cooper.

“We’re looking to make local government stronger in New Providence than in the Family Islands,” Cooper said.

“The problem is that we are looking into ways of streaming an income of revenue for local government.”

Earlier this year Press Secretary in the Office of the Prime Minister Anthony Newbold told media that the Minister of Transport and Local Government Frankie Campbell would also be looking into ways to improve how local government operates in the Family Islands.

“In his charge, minister Campbell highlighted the need for the committee to take a very good look at the current system in the Family Islands and to recommend how it can be improved,” Newbold said.

“Minister Campbell also pointed out that the leader of the opposition was invited to appoint a representative, which he did, in the person of Mr. Philip Smith, the former Member of Parliament (MP) and diplomat.”

Newbold noted earlier in the year there would be a preliminary study conducted to asses the feasibility in introducing municipal governance in the capital through an Inter-American Developmental Bank (IDB) sponsored project.

“The idea is to have local government in New Providence in time for the next general elections in 2022,” he said.

“Of importance, I note that there were eight options proposed for New Providence by the IDB study, which were reviewed and discussed by the Committee.

The members of the advisory committee include Senator Raynard Henfield (chairman); Cephas Cooper (vice-chairman & director of Local Government); Joel Lewis (acting undersecretary Ministry of Transport and Local Government); Dr. Nicola Virgil-Rolle (director, Economic Development and Planning Unit, Office of the Prime Minister); Leron Neely (Ministry of Finance); Karen Dorsett and Lenette King (Office of the Attorney-General); Diane Holowesko-Dunkley (Town Planning Committee); Philip Turner (Parliamentary Registrar), and a representative from the Bahamas Chamber of Commerce.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture