Chamber takes cautious position on govt. performance

While the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of The Bahamas Chamber of Commerce and Employers Confederation (BCCEC) Edison Sumner said he won’t dish out a grade on the current administration’s performance, he said the chamber is set to issue a full-on assessment of the country’s economic growth in the previous year.

“What we’re going to be doing is measuring the progress that we think was made from the conclave in 2017, as opposed to what’s happening in 2018,” Sumner said.

“I don’t think the chamber is going to put itself in a position to grade them whether its one to 10 or A-F. We’re still assessing their one year out.

“The chamber will be assessing the work of the government over the last 12 months, but we also must continue to recognize what we see as being some of the challenges. We know there have been a number of policies and programs that have been implemented.

“We’re also understanding as a new government, they took some time to get their feet wet.”

Sumner made note that a number of policies, which were advanced under the Minnis administration including citizen security and the justice programme, were initiatives introduced by the previous Christie administration.

He said the Minnis administration, has however, set out in the right direction and are expected to do more things as time progresses.

“The government came in with a very fresh mandate. The fact they brought in a number of very news face to frontline politics, new ministers – some of whom have come through the chamber of commerce – tells us that they came in with some fresh ideas and how they want to see the country advance,” he said.

He said the country’s affairs are difficult to manage, and said the focus for the country needs to remain staying off blacklists.

“We need to increase the level of opportunities available for young Bahamians,” he said.

Further, Sumer said, “Getting the country removed from declining positions on ease of doing business index”, is also important and that the chamber is working with the government on a number of initiatives.

Yesterday, Opposition and Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) Leader Philip Davis rated the current administration’s first year as unsatisfactory.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture