It seems Pratt could use a refresher course on the “80-20 rule”. By definition, the “rule” states that 80% of the effects of an event comes from 20% of the causes. I fail to see how this precept, even considering all of its possible applications, is applicable to what has happened here or to his personal argument.

I agree with McIntosh in that his defence is coming off as attempt at arguing that the law is discretionary.

Comments are closed.