Baha Mar dine-in reopens for non-registered guests; COVID antigen test required

NASSAU, BAHAMAS — Baha Mar is expected to implement new COVID-19 testing protocols to allow non-registered guests to dine at restaurants on property as long as they have a negative rapid antigen test.

In an update on its website yesterday, Baha Mar advised its restaurants will once again welcome non-registered guests beginning December 20.

“Reservations will be required, no walk-ins will be allowed,” the resort said.

“Non-registered guests must show proof of a negative antigen test taken within five days of your restaurant reservation, together with a copy of the confirmed reservation in order to receive admission to Baha Mar.”

Restaurants expected to reopen include 3 Tides, Carna, Da’ Poke Bowl Shack, DriftBar & Grill, El Jefe, Filia, Blue Note Jazz Bar, Katsuya, Out Island Bar, Pizza Lab, Stix, The Lynden, T2 Cigar Bar and Starbucks.

“We are thrilled to once again bring you a selection of world-class dining destinations led by our expert chefs, as well as relaxed nightlife spots and delicious options designed to please the whole family,” the resort said.

Baha Mar is expected to reopen on December 17 after months of temporary closure during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The resort said it has implemented enhanced safety and health measures. The phased reopening will commence with the Grand Hyatt. International travelers will be required to meet the entry protocols in place to visit The Bahamas.

In addition to the entry requirements and protocols established by the government, Baha Mar guests will be required to take a complimentary COVID-19 rapid antigen test upon arrival at the resort.

The multimillion-dollar resort development closed in late March due to the COVID-19 pandemic. According to Baha Mar President Graeme Davis, the resort will bring back 1,500 associates for the first phase of its reopening.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture