New animal rights group demands action over dog shootings

BAAM urges owners of seriously injured and killed dogs to take police, immigration to court

NASSAU, BAHAMAS – Bahamians Against Animal Mistreatment (BAAM) on Wednesday demanded that senior Police and Immigration officials take forceful and immediate action to discipline the officers who shot three dogs without legal cause or provocation, killing one and seriously injuring the other two.

“Eyewitness accounts of the Immigration incident and footage of the Police shooting have revealed that these disgusting acts were cynical, sadistic and carried out in cold blood, seemingly just for the fun of it. Apparently, law enforcement in The Bahamas simply loves to injure and kill innocent, defenceless animals,” outlined a statement issued yesterday from BAAM.

According to BAAM, in the Immigration incident, an officer chasing an individual through someone else’s property decided to discharge his weapon and kill the property owner’s dog.

Firstly, BAAM said it is unclear why Immigration officers are chasing suspected irregular migrants with guns drawn in the first place, or why these officers need to have firearms at all.

“Secondly, the sheer audacity displayed by this officer in thinking that he has the right to kill an animal is shocking, especially when trespassing on someone else’s property. Apparently, Immigration is above the law.

“In the police incident, several officers are seen entering a home and are not bothered or threatened by the two animals near the entrance. A short time later, one of the officers is seen returning and standing over the dogs for a few moments, before heartlessly opening fire into their faces.”

BAAM said these unspeakable acts of aggression cannot be ignored or dismissed, especially when it comes to individuals licensed to carry firearms in public.

The animal rights group said mental health experts agree that cruelty to animals is a strong sign of a capacity to harm other people without cause. Therefore, BAAM said it is also calling for an immediate and full mental evaluation of the officers in question, with a view to determining if they are capable of continuing in their current roles on the front lines of law enforcement.

“We also urge the owners of these dogs to take strong legal action against The Bahamas Department of Immigration and the Royal Bahamas Police Force. The mental and emotional distress to which they have been subjected cannot go unacknowledged or unpunished,” BAAM’s statement concluded.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture