Sky Bahamas refutes eviction rumors

Despite concerns that Bahamian airline Sky Bahamas could be facing eviction from the Lynden Pindling International Airport (LPIA) because of outstanding fees and money owed to the Nassau Airport Development Company (NAD), the company’s head said there is no need to be worried.

Sky Bahamas Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Captain Randy Butler told Eyewitness News exclusively that there is no concern about being evicted.

Butler, in a telephone interview stated that, while the letter from NAD, which made it rounds on social media today alerting the public of the issue is authentic, the figures are not the latest.

“NAD and Sky Bahamas are working out the details,” Butler explained.

“We’ve been partners for over 10 years. And, on the domestic side, they can say we’re truly been one of their leaders.”

Butler said the industry has been “very challenging” and that the real issue is about the fees associated with airline operations.

“What happened is that you can get credit through travel agencies that collect these fees,” he said.

“These are all of our leases, all of our bills, holdings and all of those things are current with NAD you just have to do with what they call a facility fee. And what happens is that we have creditors like the government agencies, others that collect this tax and then that tax is remitted to us and we remit it to NAD.”

He also clarified that the money outstanding does not mean Sky Bahamas is unable to meet its commitments.

“So, we bill out 30 days and some people bill out 45 or 60 days – of course the government pays when they’re ready – and we have to pay value-added tax (VAT) on the taxes and on the bills that are owed, we have to pay that. So, NAD has been good with us – with working out those times,” he said.

“But I know they are having some challenging times too.

“We’ve been partners in working out agreements.”

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture