Consumers: Too late to cry over VAT

Just two days after the 4.5 per cent hike in value-added tax (VAT), some consumers and store owners are now saying that it’s too late to cry over the increase.

While some are still not pleased with the change, most told Eyewitness News, that they are resigned to go along with the tax scale, noting that the hike was necessary for the country to grow economically.

“This should’ve happened five years ago,” according to Delereese Johnson, a Super Value shopper.

“I don’t mind the 12 per cent. It’s either that or we end up like Haiti. It’s summertime now. You go check out the airports. People will still be vacationing – no one is canceling their trips to Disney World.”

As for store owners, they told Eyewitness News that they’re still undergoing changes.

President of Automotive Industrial Distributors (A.I.D.) Philip Watson said, the company is still looking into system preparations for price changes.

“Our store in Freeport was closed for over an hour and a half this morning because our system wasn’t ready,” Watson said.

“We have over seven different locations (but) we haven’t had any problems in New Providence.”

While some stores have updated their prices, others have been accused of price gouging.

Prime Minister Dr. Hubert Minnis gave a stern warning to all store owners recently, as he assured that they will be penalized for price gouging and that there are current officers on duty, specifically looking to see if prices are accurate.

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget
Team BTC Engages Rotary Club on the Future of Connectivity
Op-Ed: Brave ‘Papa Tax’ Davis and his mid-year budget

In February 2015, the Registrar General Department entered into a contractual agreement with VRC, formerly known as Sunshine Shredder, to digitize its company files as part of a long-overdue transition from paper-based records to a modern, paperless system. The initial cost of the contract was a staggering $89,000 for the first month, followed by an ongoing monthly fee of $85,000. Notably, the agreement lacked a clearly defined project timeline or end date, raising immediate concerns about fiscal oversight and accountability. Tragically, while scanning commenced, the project quickly revealed an alarming absence of quality control and verification protocols. The digitization process, meant to enhance access, accuracy, and operational efficiency, was executed with such poor foresight that the resulting digital records are effectively unusable by the Company Section. The core issue lies in the contract specifications. VRC was commissioned to scan and input data into only three (3) fields, despite the operational requirement being six (6) fields for full functionality within the Department’s systems. This fundamental oversight rendered the digitized records incomplete and incompatible with current needs. Attempts to rectify this monumental error have proven financially unviable. Discussions to incorporate the additional fields revealed that doing so would triple the cost an egregious escalation with no guarantee of improved results. To make matters worse, in 2024, when the Registrar General’s office relocated to a new building, the internal scanning unit comprising trained staff who could have potentially salvaged or improved the process was dismantled. These personnel were reassigned to other departments, effectively dissolving any in-house capacity for quality control or intervention. This sequence of decisions paints a troubling picture of systemic mismanagement, questionable contractual negotiations, and a lack of strategic vision. The public deserves transparency, and those responsible for this financial and operational fiasco must be held to account. A project intended to usher in digital transformation has instead become a cautionary tale of waste and ineptitude at the expense of taxpayers and national record integrity.

Add New Playlist

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
Hide picture